Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (2024)

Physical Review Applied

  • Highlights
  • Recent
  • Subjects
  • Accepted
  • Collections
  • Authors
  • Referees
  • Search
  • Press
  • About
  • Editorial Team

Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers

Yongming Li, Xikui Ma, Xuchen Wang, and Sergei Tretyakov
Phys. Rev. Applied 21, 054060 – Published 29 May 2024
  • Article
  • References
  • No Citing Articles

PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

In the context of electromagnetic absorption, it is obvious that for an infinite planar periodic structure illuminated by a plane wave the maximum attainable absorptance, i.e., perfect absorption, is theoretically limited to 100% of the incident power. Here we show that an intriguing possibility of overcoming this limit arises in finite-sized resonant absorbing arrays. We present a comprehensive analysis of a simple two-dimensional strip array over an infinite perfectly conducting plane, where the strips are loaded with bulk-impedance loads. The absorptance is defined as the ratio of the dissipated power per unit length of the strips to the incident power on a unit length of the array width. The results show that even regular subwavelength arrays of impedance strips can slightly overcome the limit of 100% absorptance, while with use of aperiodic arrays with optimized loads, absorptance can be significantly increased as compared with the scenario where the strips are identical. In principle, by tuning of the bulk loads, high superunity absorptance can be realized for all angles of illumination.

  • Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (1)
  • Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (2)
  • Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (3)
  • Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (4)
  • Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (5)
  • Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (6)
  • Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (7)

3 More

  • Received 19 February 2024
  • Revised 12 April 2024
  • Accepted 7 May 2024

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.054060

© 2024 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied PhysicsAtomic, Molecular & Optical

Authors & Affiliations

Yongming Li1,2,*, Xikui Ma1, Xuchen Wang3, and Sergei Tretyakov2

  • *Corresponding author: yongmingli@stu.xjtu.edu.cn

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Issue

Vol. 21, Iss. 5 — May 2024

Subject Areas
  • Metamaterials
  • Photonics
Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (8)
Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (11)

Authorization Required

Other Options
  • Buy Article »
  • Find an Institution with the Article »

×

Download & Share

PDFExportReuse & Permissions

×

Images

  • Figure 1

    (a) Front view of an infinite periodic strip array placed over an infinite ground plane and illuminated by a plane wave traveling in the direction of θi. The distance between the two adjacent strips is d. (b) Top view of the array. The strips are loaded with bulk impedances inserted periodically with period l. The width of the strips is w. Both l and w are much smaller than the wavelength in free space. The periodically loaded strips can be modeled as hom*ogeneous-impedance strips with impedances per unit length ZL. (c) Equivalent circuit of the system.

    Reuse & Permissions

  • Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (13)

    Figure 2

    (a) Finite-width strip array above an infinite PEC ground plane under illumination by a TE-polarized plane wave at θi. (b) Top view of the structure. The first strip is at the position y=0, z=h.

    Reuse & Permissions

  • Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (14)

    Figure 3

    Absorptance as a function of the incident angle θi for a designed incident angle of (a) 0 and (b) 80. For finite-sized absorbers, the solid red curve indicates the reference case (Ref.; all the load impedances are the same as for the designed periodic infinite array), while the dashed blue curve shows the optimized case (Opt.; the optimized loads). The dotted black curve shows the absorptance of the designed infinite absorber (Inf.).

    Reuse & Permissions

  • Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (15)

    Figure 4

    Induced-current distribution for two designed incident angles θi of (a) 0 and (b) 80. The dotted black curve corresponds to infinite absorbers (Inf.). For finite-sized absorbers, the solid red curve and the solid blue curve represent the reference case (Inf.; connected with identical loads) and the optimized case (Opt.; connected with optimized loads), respectively. The dot-dashed purple curve in (b) represents the induced-current distribution when the incident plane wave is traveling from 77.

    Reuse & Permissions

  • Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (16)

    Figure 5

    Absorptance as a function of incident angle θi for different-sized strip arrays, where the designed angle of incidence is 80.

    Reuse & Permissions

  • Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (17)

    Figure 6

    Load-impedance distributions for two designed incident angles: (a) θi=0 and (b) θi=80. The red curves show the load impedances of the optimized loads (Opt.), while the blue curves represent the values of the reference (Ref.) load impedance. The solid and dashed curves represent the real and imaginary parts of the load impedance, respectively. The solid green line shows the symmetry axis of the strip array.

    Reuse & Permissions

  • Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (18)

    Figure 7

    (a) Schematic diagram for the comsol multiphysics simulation. The simulation domain is surrounded by a perfectly matched layer (PML). The array is positioned in the center of the simulation domain. The incident angle of the plane wave is 80. (b) Real part of the scattered electric field (with the unit of volt per meter) distribution for the reference uniform array. Numerical results (upper panel) and analytical results (lower panel). (c) Same as (b) for an array with the optimized loads. Numerical results (upper panel) and analytical results (lower panel).

    Reuse & Permissions

  • Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (19)

    Figure 8

    Absorptance as a function of the normalized frequency for arrays of different sizes (indicated in the legend), when the incident angle is 80. The results for the reference uniform absorbers (Ref.) are represented in red, while the curves for the optimized absorbers (Opt.) are shown in blue.

    Reuse & Permissions

  • Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (20)

    Figure 9

    Optimized results for absorptance as a function of incident angle for different periods and expected incident angles.

    Reuse & Permissions

  • Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (21)

    Figure 10

    Absorptance as a function of incident angle for different array sizes.

    Reuse & Permissions

×

Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Chrissy Homenick

Last Updated:

Views: 5756

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (74 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Chrissy Homenick

Birthday: 2001-10-22

Address: 611 Kuhn Oval, Feltonbury, NY 02783-3818

Phone: +96619177651654

Job: Mining Representative

Hobby: amateur radio, Sculling, Knife making, Gardening, Watching movies, Gunsmithing, Video gaming

Introduction: My name is Chrissy Homenick, I am a tender, funny, determined, tender, glorious, fancy, enthusiastic person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.