Physical Review Applied
- Highlights
- Recent
- Subjects
- Accepted
- Collections
- Authors
- Referees
- Search
- Press
- About
- Editorial Team
Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers
Yongming Li, Xikui Ma, Xuchen Wang, and Sergei Tretyakov
Phys. Rev. Applied 21, 054060 – Published 29 May 2024
- Article
- References
- No Citing Articles
PDFHTMLExport Citation
Abstract
In the context of electromagnetic absorption, it is obvious that for an infinite planar periodic structure illuminated by a plane wave the maximum attainable absorptance, i.e., perfect absorption, is theoretically limited to 100% of the incident power. Here we show that an intriguing possibility of overcoming this limit arises in finite-sized resonant absorbing arrays. We present a comprehensive analysis of a simple two-dimensional strip array over an infinite perfectly conducting plane, where the strips are loaded with bulk-impedance loads. The absorptance is defined as the ratio of the dissipated power per unit length of the strips to the incident power on a unit length of the array width. The results show that even regular subwavelength arrays of impedance strips can slightly overcome the limit of 100% absorptance, while with use of aperiodic arrays with optimized loads, absorptance can be significantly increased as compared with the scenario where the strips are identical. In principle, by tuning of the bulk loads, high superunity absorptance can be realized for all angles of illumination.
3 More
- Received 19 February 2024
- Revised 12 April 2024
- Accepted 7 May 2024
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.054060
© 2024 American Physical Society
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
- Research Areas
Integrated opticsWave scattering
- Physical Systems
- Techniques
Electromagnetic wave theoryResonance techniques
Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied PhysicsAtomic, Molecular & Optical
Authors & Affiliations
Yongming Li1,2,*, Xikui Ma1, Xuchen Wang3, and Sergei Tretyakov2
- 1State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, School of Electrical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710049, China
- 2Department of Electronics and Nanoengineering, Aalto University, P.O. Box 15500, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland
- 3Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, P.O. Box 3640, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
- *Corresponding author: yongmingli@stu.xjtu.edu.cn
Article Text (Subscription Required)
Click to Expand
References (Subscription Required)
Click to Expand
Issue
Vol. 21, Iss. 5 — May 2024
Subject Areas
- Metamaterials
- Photonics
Access Options
- Buy Article »
- Log in with individual APS Journal Account »
- Log in with a username/password provided by your institution »
- Get access through a U.S. public or high school library »
![Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (11) Going beyond perfect absorption: Superdirective absorbers (11)](https://i0.wp.com/cdn.journals.aps.org/development/journals/images/author-services-placard.png)
Images
Figure 1
(a) Front view of an infinite periodic strip array placed over an infinite ground plane and illuminated by a plane wave traveling in the direction of . The distance between the two adjacent strips is . (b) Top view of the array. The strips are loaded with bulk impedances inserted periodically with period . The width of the strips is . Both and are much smaller than the wavelength in free space. The periodically loaded strips can be modeled as hom*ogeneous-impedance strips with impedances per unit length . (c) Equivalent circuit of the system.
Figure 2
(a) Finite-width strip array above an infinite PEC ground plane under illumination by a TE-polarized plane wave at . (b) Top view of the structure. The first strip is at the position , .
Figure 3
Absorptance as a function of the incident angle for a designed incident angle of (a) and (b) . For finite-sized absorbers, the solid red curve indicates the reference case (Ref.; all the load impedances are the same as for the designed periodic infinite array), while the dashed blue curve shows the optimized case (Opt.; the optimized loads). The dotted black curve shows the absorptance of the designed infinite absorber (Inf.).
Figure 4
Induced-current distribution for two designed incident angles of (a) and (b) . The dotted black curve corresponds to infinite absorbers (Inf.). For finite-sized absorbers, the solid red curve and the solid blue curve represent the reference case (Inf.; connected with identical loads) and the optimized case (Opt.; connected with optimized loads), respectively. The dot-dashed purple curve in (b) represents the induced-current distribution when the incident plane wave is traveling from .
Figure 5
Absorptance as a function of incident angle for different-sized strip arrays, where the designed angle of incidence is .
Figure 6
Load-impedance distributions for two designed incident angles: (a) and (b) . The red curves show the load impedances of the optimized loads (Opt.), while the blue curves represent the values of the reference (Ref.) load impedance. The solid and dashed curves represent the real and imaginary parts of the load impedance, respectively. The solid green line shows the symmetry axis of the strip array.
Figure 7
(a) Schematic diagram for the comsol multiphysics simulation. The simulation domain is surrounded by a perfectly matched layer (PML). The array is positioned in the center of the simulation domain. The incident angle of the plane wave is . (b) Real part of the scattered electric field (with the unit of volt per meter) distribution for the reference uniform array. Numerical results (upper panel) and analytical results (lower panel). (c) Same as (b) for an array with the optimized loads. Numerical results (upper panel) and analytical results (lower panel).
Figure 8
Absorptance as a function of the normalized frequency for arrays of different sizes (indicated in the legend), when the incident angle is . The results for the reference uniform absorbers (Ref.) are represented in red, while the curves for the optimized absorbers (Opt.) are shown in blue.
Figure 9
Optimized results for absorptance as a function of incident angle for different periods and expected incident angles.